Aristotelis Thanos vs Daniel Milavsky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 12 Nov at 11:00 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

A. Thanos vs D. Milavsky

Aristotelis Thanos
Aristotelis Thanos

Flag GRE GRE

w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
Daniel Milavsky
Daniel Milavsky

Flag USA USA

w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
l

0

Win

1

Played

1

Win

24
Age
24
-
Height
-
494
C. Rank
406
433
Best Rank
369
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Thanos 0 - 1 Milavsky

They have played 2 sets in total, with Aristotelis Thanos winning 0 and Daniel Milavsky winning 2. The last match between Daniel Milavsky and Aristotelis Thanos was at the Drummondville Challenger, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Thanos0
Milavsky1
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1Drummondville Challenger(11-12-25)

I.hard
USA Flag
Daniel Milavsky
6
6
GRE Flag
Aristotelis Thanos
3
4

A. Thanos vs D. Milavsky H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
62.50% (140-84)Career Total W/L66.67% (64-32)
0Indoor1
3Titles4
0Total H2H Matches1
100.00% (1-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

A. Thanos vs D. Milavsky Match Preview:

  • In terms of second serve performance, Daniel Milavsky seems to have an advantage, winning 47.17% of points compared to Aristotelis Thanos' 40.85% over the past six months. What impact does this have on their match prediction? This suggests a stronger serve consistency for Milavsky.
  • Regarding return game effectiveness, Thanos has an edge, capturing 49.03% of second serve return points against his opponents, whereas Milavsky has secured 43.52%. For first serve returns, Thanos again leads with 28.39% compared to Milavsky's 24.71%. Does this suggest Thanos might outperform on returns? Indeed, he appears more aggressive in breaking serves.
  • Under pressure, Milavsky has a slight upper hand, saving 55.22% of breakpoints, which exceeds Thanos' 47.14%. Could this indicate better resilience? It indeed suggests that Milavsky performs better under high-pressure scenarios.
  • Performance over the last year shows Milavsky's superior match success, with a 70.42% win rate compared to Thanos' 65.96%. Might this reflect greater overall consistency? Yes, Milavsky holds a slight advantage here as well.
  • Evaluating career surfaces, Thanos excels on Clay with a 68% win rate, while his record on Hard courts is lower at 58%. Conversely, Milavsky is most successful on Indoor Hard courts, where he has a 68% win rate, but falters on Grass.
  • Both players have played primarily on the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits, with Milavsky maintaining a slightly better win rate of 78.43% against Thanos' 77.78% at the $10K tournament level.
  • Opponent strength over the past 12 months is similar, with Thanos facing opponents of an average rank of 419.98, closely matching Milavsky's average opponent rank of 416.23.
  • In deciding sets, Thanos shows a marginal preference, winning 64% compared to Milavsky's 63%. Could this suggest a competitive edge in crucial moments? It indicates Thanos might have a slight psychological advantage.

Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent form and historical performance, Daniel Milavsky demonstrates superior second serve points consistency, which is a vital component for maintaining service games. This statistic is often predictive of match outcomes.

Despite Milavsky’s stronger performance under pressure and his overall higher match win percentage in the past year, Aristotelis Thanos shows greater effectiveness in the return game, particularly against second serves. Thanos' ability to convert return chances could prove crucial.

Both players are closely matched in their record against opponents of similar strength, implying an evenly poised contest. However, Milavsky’s strength on crucial breakpoints, combined with his slight historical edge, suggests a very slight favoritism.

Given these observations and factoring in Milavsky's better breakpoint saving ability, he is marginally more likely to win the upcoming match. Yet, Thanos' prowess in return games means he can't be underestimated, especially if the match becomes a grind into long rallies.

Aristotelis Thanos vs Daniel Milavsky Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Thanos vs D. Milavsky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
0H2H Matches Won1
0Sets Won2
7Games Won12
5Aces (Total)4
5Total Double Faults2
1:33:32Average Match Time1:33:32
55% (30/55)1st Serve %57% (46/80)
67% (20/30)1st Serve Win %61% (28/46)
32% (8/25)2nd Serve Win %53% (18/34)
43% (3/7)Break Pts Won %71% (5/7)
43% (34/80)Return Points Win %49% (27/55)
0% (0/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Thanos 46%, Milavsky 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Thanos 54%, Milavsky 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Thanos 58%, Milavsky 63%.

A. Thanos Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardAthens Challenger - 24-11-2025

R1

GBRA. Fery
L
1-6 6-4 6-4
I.hardDrummondville Challenger - 10-11-2025

R1

USAD. Milavsky
L
6-3 6-4
I.hardKnoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025

R1

COLN. Mejia
L
6-4 7-5
ClayCuritiba Challenger - 13-10-2025

R1

BRAD. Dutra
L
6-4 6-1

Q3

BRAD. Dutra
W
6-3 6-4

D. Milavsky Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardTemuco Challenger - 24-11-2025

R1

BRAE. Ribeiro
L
4-6 6-4 6-2
I.hardDrummondville Challenger - 10-11-2025

R2

GBRC. Broom
L
2-6 6-4 6-2

R1

GREA. Thanos
W
6-3 6-4
I.hardM25 Montreal - 03-11-2025

R2

USAC. Kingsley
L
6-3 3-6 7-6(6)

R1

CZED. Poljak
W
6-0 3-6 6-1
banner

A. Thanos vs D. Milavsky Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
62.50% (140/84)YTD Win/Loss66.67% (64/32)
60.40% (302/198)Sets Win/Loss62.72% (143/85)
55.22% (2570/2084)Games Win/Loss55.09% (1202/980)
57.52% (65/48)Hard Win/Loss65.08% (41/22)
68.42% (65/30)Clay Win/Loss50.00% (3/3)
62.50% (10/6)Indoor Hard W/L76.92% (20/6)
0% (0/0)Grass Win/Loss0.00% (0/1)
0.21Aces Per Game0.42
481Aces Total442
0.3Double Faults Per Game0.29
689Total Double Faults304
1:13:17Average Match Time1:32:32
353.43Average Opponent Rank373.57
59% (5988/10079)1st Serve %60% (3468/5747)
67% (4034/5988)1st Serve Win %72% (2491/3468)
46% (1873/4091)2nd Serve Win %52% (1176/2279)
48% (527/1090)Break Points Won % (Total)42% (247/595)
43% (4272/9914)Return Points Win %40% (2325/5787)
66.67% (4/2)Cups W/L0% (0/0)
42.86% (9/12)Challenger W/L47.83% (11/12)
64.47% (127/70)Futures W/L72.60% (53/20)
63% (137/217)Best of 3 Sets Win %66% (61/93)
100% (3/3)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (1/1)
56% (27/48)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)39% (11/28)
60% (32/53)Deciding Set Win %54% (20/37)
92% (130/119)1st Set Won, Won Match87% (62/54)
8% (130/11)1st Set Won, Lost Match11% (62/7)
23% (94/22)1st Set Lost, Won Match26% (34/9)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sun, 07 Dec, 10:30 AM
Prediction
EGYF. Zakaria5
UKRV. Ursu3
W1
1.98
W2
1.72
Sun, 07 Dec, 06:00 AM
Prediction
FRAA. Weber1
USAB. Shick7
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Sun, 07 Dec, 12:00 PM
Prediction
FRAR. Bertrand1
GRED. Sakellaridis7
W1
1.164
W2
4.4
Sun, 07 Dec, 06:30 AM
Prediction
INDD. Singh6
INDM. Kesarwani
W1
1.166
W2
4.35
Sun, 07 Dec, 01:00 PM
Prediction
ROUS. Palosi3
ESPM. A. Gurri2
W1
2.72
W2
1.39
  1. NFL Upcoming Matches
  2. NHL Upcoming Matches
  3. MLB Upcoming Matches
  4. NBA Upcoming Matches
  5. Football Upcoming Matches
  6. Tennis Upcoming Matches
  7. Table Tennis Upcoming Matches